SCIENTISTS
have built the world’s smallest biological
computer and programmed it to identify and kill
cancer cells, which could pave to the way to the
development of microscopic robots that swim
through the bloodstream diagnosing and treating
disease.
The miniature machine, which uses a handful
of DNA molecules as its software, measures just
100 nanometres across, meaning that a thousand
billion would fit into a teardrop and almost ten
million on the full stop at the end of this
sentence.
Despite its tiny
dimensions, it is sufficiently powerful to
detect the chemical signature of prostate or
lung cancer cells, and then release a drug to
destroy them. The entire process takes just a
couple of minutes.
The breakthrough, at the Weizmann Institute
in Israel, offers the strongest indication yet
that it will eventually be possible to build
tiny medical “nanosubs” that hunt down tumours
and germs before delivering their drugs.
Although such a “smart drug” or “doctor in a
cell” is decades away, the prospect is
considered among the most exciting of all the
medical applications of nanotechnology.
It would allow doctors to target disease much
more precisely and completely than before.
Nanosubs could potentially check every cell in
the body for cancer, knocking out the abnormal
ones while leaving healthy ones alone. Tumours
would be eliminated more thoroughly, while
patients would be spared the unpleasant
side-effects of chemotherapy, which poisons
normal as well as cancerous tissue.
The idea of using a microscopic hunter-killer
submarine to treat disease has echoes of the
1960s science fiction film Fantastic
Voyage, in which a vessel crewed by Raquel
Welch and Stephen Boyd is shrunk by military
researchers and dispatched to destroy a blood
clot threatening the life of a key scientist.
In the Weizmann study, details of which were
published online yesterday by the journal
Nature, Ehud Shapiro led a team which
adapted a miniature biological computer first
built last year and recognised by The
Guinness Book of World Records as the
smallest in the world.
“Our medical computer might one day be
administered as a drug, and be distributed
throughout the body by the bloodstream to detect
disease markers autonomously and independently
in every cell,” Professor Shapiro said.
“In this way, a single cancer cell could be
detected and destroyed before the tumour
develops. Even in a late-stage cancer, this kind
of treatment could reach every secondary growth,
however small, and effectively terminate the
disease.
The system’s input is a single
double-stranded DNA molecule, which assesses the
concentration of RNA (an indicator of genetic
activity) molecules around it. These can be
overproduced or underproduced by different types
of cancer cell. This information is then fed
into the computer’s computation module, which
combines DNA software with hardware composed of
an enzyme known as FokI. It examines the RNA
signals picked up by the input molecule to
determine the diagnosis.
If cancer is detected, the computer orders
the release of a single-strand DNA molecule
designed to induce cancer cells to
self-destruct. The whole assembly comprises no
more than 20 molecules, which are held together
in solution rather than connected to one another
like the components of a laptop.
In the experiments, the computer successfully
identified both prostate and lung cancer, and
released appropriate drugs to fight them. These
results, however, were obtained in a highly
controlled test tube environment, in which the
computer was not exposed to bodily proteins,
acids and fats that might destroy it or disrupt
its function.
Professor Shapiro said that the technology
would have to be refined considerably before it
could be tested in animal models, let alone
human beings. Nevertheless, the research
“represents the first proof of concept and the
first demonstration of a possible real-life
application for this kind of computer”. He said:
“It is clear that the road to realising our
vision is a long one. It may take decades before
such a system operating inside the human body
becomes a reality.
Nevertheless, only two years ago we predicted
that it would take another ten years to reach
the point we have reached today.”